Zhang Weili's ranking of the top-three UFC women's champions has sparked debate, with Ronda Rousey taking the top spot. This controversial choice has ignited a discussion among fans and experts alike. Weili's decision to place Rousey ahead of Amanda Nunes and Valentina Shevchenko has raised questions about her criteria and the criteria for determining the best female champions in the UFC.
Weili's ranking is based on her own personal criteria, which she believes is more important than the consensus among fans and experts. She has stated that Rousey won the first-ever women's belt, which is a significant achievement in the history of women's MMA. Additionally, Weili's ranking of Nunes in second place is based on her multiple belt wins and successful defenses, which are also notable achievements.
However, Weili's ranking has not been without controversy. Valentina Shevchenko, a reigning flyweight champion, has questioned Weili's criteria, suggesting that Weili is not an elite fighter. Shevchenko's claim has raised questions about the criteria for determining the best female champions in the UFC, and whether Weili's ranking is based on personal bias or objective criteria.
Despite the controversy, Weili's ranking has sparked a discussion among fans and experts, who are debating the criteria for determining the best female champions in the UFC. The debate has also raised questions about the criteria for determining the 'GWOAT' status in the UFC, and whether Weili's ranking is a reflection of her own personal criteria or a reflection of the consensus among fans and experts.
