In a recent podcast, WWE Hall of Famer Jim Ross delves into the debate surrounding the existence of two world titles in WWE's Raw and SmackDown brands. Ross questions the necessity of multiple champions, stating, 'I don't know why they need two champions. It's just to tease a few guys, I guess.' This sparks a discussion on the hierarchy of WWE and the brand split, with host Conrad Thompson acknowledging the logistical need for separate champions to headline each evening. But here's where it gets controversial... Ross' stance on the matter is that it's not essential, and he questions the value of CM Punk's presentation as a world champion, defending his in-ring ability and microphone skills instead. Contrasting Punk with the new SmackDown champion, Drew McIntyre, Ross notes that McIntyre's physical presentation aligns with the traditional athletic archetype preferred in professional wrestling. While McIntyre's physique is admired, Ross acknowledges that historical figures like Dusty Rhodes drew money without possessing a bodybuilder physique. This leads to a thought-provoking question for the audience: Is the athletic look the sole requirement for a champion? And this is the part most people miss... Ross' perspective offers a unique insight into the world of professional wrestling, inviting fans to share their thoughts on the matter in the comments.
